![]() ![]() In a detailed column about the CBA, Stark adds some details about the schedule changes that will begin in 2023. Going forward, they will have a greater chance to interrupt such a unique back-and-forth as occurred with Nottingham last year. ![]() (For the first 31 days of the season, the standings of the previous season are used.) In the case of Nottingham, there would have been some teams that never even had the ability to make a claim on him for most of that sequence last year, as he would have been scooped up before their turn. Waiver claim priority generally goes in reverse order of the current standings. On May 2oth, Seattle claimed him again, before putting him back on the wire in early June, when he finally cleared. The Brewers brought him back on a waiver claim, only to send him back onto the waiver wire two weeks later. Beginning the season with the Brewers, the catcher was put on waivers in April, claimed by the Mariners, who put him back on waivers on May. “If a team has already claimed a player once on waivers that season, it can’t claim him again until every other team has passed.” Stark aptly refers to this as the “ Jacob Nottingham Rule,” in reference to the fact that Nottingham was the centerpiece of a game of hot potato between the Brewers and Mariners last year. This wrinkle in the new CBA could help the teams further those goals, but at least could give some borderline non-tender candidates the silver lining of greater financial security.Įlsewhere in the CBA, Jayson Stark of The Athletic provides an interesting nugget on Twitter. In 2019, it was revealed that MLB holds an annual symposium where the team that best succeeds at opposing the players in arbitration is awarded a wrestling-style championship belt, something that surely didn’t help with the animosity that’s lingered between the players and the league since the signing of the last CBA. ![]() It is well established that teams put a high priority on stifling salaries as much as possible. But this also gives them incentive to accept terms without the hearing, perhaps leading to them accepting lower terms than they otherwise would have earned, thus benefiting the teams. On the one hand, this could be viewed as a gain for the players, as they now have access to greater security, knowing that the salary they accept will be locked in once they agree to it. If the player was released less than 15 days before Opening Day, they would get 45 days’ pay. If a team released a player more than 15 days prior to Opening Day, they only had to pay the player 30 days’ salary as termination pay. Under the previous CBA, arbitration contracts were not fully guaranteed until Opening Day, with players cut during Spring Training only earning a portion of the agreed-upon salary. ![]() This is a small change that could potentially have significant ramifications. Mark Feinsand of MLB.com revealed one such detail on Twitter, writing that, “Beginning after 2022, salary arbitration eligible players who settle with their teams on a salary for the subsequent season without going to a hearing will be eligible to receive full season termination pay, even if released prior to the start of the season.” The major elements of the deal, such as the CBT levels and the bonus pool for arbitration-eligible players, were reported on as the negotiations transpired, but some of the minor details are still trickling out. MLB and the MLBPA finally reached a deal on a new collective bargaining agreement on Thursday, ending a contentious lockout that spanned over three months. Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2022. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |